Tag: work

Communicating in 2016: Leave Good Messages

Communicating in 2016: Leave Good Messages

Subtitled; Never Just Say ‘Ping’

I was chatting with my friend Dan today, who works for one of the biggest publishing houses in the world. I’ve known Dan for a really long time. Here’s a picture of us from almost ten years ago:

r6qwido4tw-3000x3000

Dan was telling me that his subsection of the company was starting to use Slack for communication at work. You know Slack right? We’ve been using Slack for a while at Automattic (for a time, the open source WordPress project was the biggest single group using Slack – or so I heard. Couldn’t tell you if that’s still true!).

Continue reading “Communicating in 2016: Leave Good Messages”

2015: The Good Stuff

2015: The Good Stuff

This is the third chunk of my 2015 wrap up series. Here are my broad goals for 2016, and here are the things that I think I could have done better in 2015. 

My vision statement for 2015 was “Send value into the universe, selflessly.” Looking back today, in January 2016, I think that I stayed true to that vision statement. Both at work and at home, I spent a lot of time and brain power finding ways to create value, create connections between people, and unlock the treasures that were trapped inside their own little silos.

Like my list of things that could have gone better, I’m going to try to focus on things that I directly created or did, rather than simply thought about. These are the things that count, I think.

Continue reading “2015: The Good Stuff”

Lessons from 2015

Lessons from 2015

In taking some time to look back through my 2015 calendar and flip back through all of my posts for the year, I tried to sort things into two piles – things that went well, and things that didn’t go well.

Broadly, in my own life, I’m trying to focus more on things that are created, that move from the world of the mental into the world of the actual. I’ve tried to keep my went-well and didn’t-go-well piles limited only to that sort of thing, since it’s hard to say whether an idea “went well” if it did not result in any type of action or tangible outcome.

Continue reading “Lessons from 2015”

My Team Lead Page

My Team Lead Page

As a Team Lead at WordPress.com, I’m constantly trying to improve, trying to learn how to be the best lead I can be. It can be hard: leading a team remotely is a new skillset, not just for me but for humans in general.

On one hand, humans have been organizing into groups to accomplish bigger goals for about as long as there have been humans, so the ground I’m walking is pretty well trod at this point. On the other hand, there are aspects of remote leadership that are totally new – we’re pushing the boundaries, and seeing what sticks and what doesn’t.

One thing I’ve done – maybe totally self-indulgent, I acknowledge that – is set up a page specifically about me, and my leadership style, on my team’s internal O2. Here’s an old post from Matt about P2s (the precursor to O2).

The goal of this page is to introduce myself to new team members, to help current team members understand my approach and thinking, and to try to be more transparent about the way I think and the way I work.

The Big Premise is, I guess, that being more transparent and up front about this stuff is better than letting people slowly figure it out on their own. It seemed like an appropriate thing to share here, and seek some feedback. Like anything, this is a work in progress, and will change over time.

The rest of this Post is the copy from that Page – what do you think? Am I ridiculous?

Team Lead

Who is this dude?

dough-boys-600x450_360
(I’m the one on the right)

What does he do?

That’s a great question 🙂 Leads at Automattic approach the job differently.

Athens is an experimental team: we’re not bound to any one support medium, and we’re trusted quite broadly to strike where we see the biggest wins available. In such an experimental environment, I try to keep an open and flexible mindset around the lead role.

My general approach to the lead role is one of servant leader. I’m here to support you, to coach you, to help you become the person you’d like to become.

I like to have one-on-one chats with each of my team members every week, especially during the early days of a Happiness Engineer’s career at Automattic, or after a team switch or other big move. This isn’t a forever thing: I’m comfortable having one-on-ones less frequently, or sometimes not at all. The real question behind these chats is: How can I best support you? Not everyone wants to talk every week, and it isn’t the best tool for everyone. I get that.

I also spend time reviewing chat transcripts and tickets – this is tricky because, like any improvement effort, the focus is almost entirely on the Sad Robots (these are our form of needs-improvement feedback from customers). To improve, one must focus on the pieces that are not yet performant, and the best way for me to identify those pieces is through existing negative feedback. You don’t fix a sink that doesn’t leak 🙂

One thing I really enjoy and find great satisfaction in is career development and goal setting: In our one-on-ones, I want to hear from you about your goals, about your dreams, about the change you’d like to see in the world. From the lead perspective, I’m able to see a broader picture of you, your work, and how it can fit into the jigsaw-puzzle-in-a-hedge-maze that is Automattic. I can use that broader picture to help you navigate to a place where you’re more impactful, more satisfied – in general terms, a superhero.

What is his philosophy?

sistercoritarules1-1


Substitute “Lead” for “Teacher” and “HE” for “Student.”

“Someone wise or smart” is not me; you need to find an inspiring figure in your own life. Read books and watch movies, you’ll find someone. Maybe lots of someones.

We really are breaking all the rules: leave space for serendipity. 🙂

If you’re the type of person who wants to know more about my thinking on The Work, you can find lots of it here.

“Buy vs Build” and the Employment Contract

Reflections on "buy vs build"

The post Reflections on “buy vs build” from the Domino Lab blog got me to thinking about how building homegrown solutions vs. buying a solution from another party can be seen through the lens of the employment contract.

Plenty has been said about the modern day employment contract, especially in terms of loyalty (both to company and to employee). The idea that modern employees are more like short-term contractors, looking to both gain personal value and add value to their employer, is one that really resonates with me.

I expect this will grow into a longer piece in the future, but at least on first glance, a tendency to build in-house rather than bring in more general solutions shifts power in the equation from the worker to the employer.

Imagine we have two workers, one of whom uses a commonly employed solution at work – we’ll say Oracle HR software. The other uses an entirely home-grown HR software solution, which is not seen anywhere outside of their current company. Both employees are ambitious and word hard, and become skilled and savvy with their particular solution.

In three years, when both of these folks decide it’s time to go on the hunt for a new job, who has gained more real-world, marketable value?