Tag: coffee

3/26/2012 Brew

Random Brew Recipe:  45g coffee / 1 kg water, 5 minute brew time.

Brew Method: Clever
Actual Recipe: 20g coffee, 445g water at 198F
Coffee: Costa Rica Tarrazu, in-house fluid air bed roasted (aka popcorn popper)

Notes notes notes: This is about 1/3 less coffee than I would usually use, and about 1-2 minutes longer than I would brew with for a Clever. One thing this random brew generator has gotten me to is an appreciation for the hugely variable ways in which coffee can taste good. Not great, or life-changing, but just good.

I would have anticipated this cup being thin and unpleasant – and the body is lacking, surely, but it is only unpleasantly so during its warmest stages – as it cools the body remains unremarkable but a bit of sweetness comes out, and it rounds out the finish in a really nice way. A bit nutty, a little caramel near the end – this cup is not great art. It’s not direct traded and I don’t have any idea what I’m doing with the IHFABR (that’s in-house fluid air bed roaster), at least not yet – but this cup is still good. I’ll finish it.

I’d give it a 7/10. Not awful, and not life-changing, but totally OK.

3/23/2012 Brew

Random Brew Recipe:  77g coffee / 1 kg water, 3 minute brew time.

Brew Method: V60 using an American Coffee Trader cloth filter
Actual Recipe: 23g coffee, 300g water at 198F
Coffee: Mad Cap Coffee Burundi Gacokwe

Notes notes notes: First, grinding this coffee smelled awesome. Sweet and light and promising.

The hot aroma is almost buttery, and the body of this coffee at this brew recipe is really standout. It has a soft peak of acidity, round with notes of some stonefruit, maybe melon? It finishes soft but drawn out. This is a really nice cup. The dosage is a bit higher than I would have usually used, but I think it really worked out well in conjunction with the cloth filter. I am interested in another cup for sure.

I’d give it a 9/10.

3/21/2012 Brew

Random Brew Recipe:  37g coffee / 1 kg water, 4 minute brew time.

Brew Method: Bonavita into Chemex
Actual Recipe: 37g coffee, 1 kg water at 200F
Coffee: New Harvest Coffee Roasters’ Rwanda Coko

Notes notes notes: This coffee I am fairly familiar with. It’s offered by a few roasters, each of whom have their own take. One of our employees recently competed in the NERBC using this coffee. It is actually going to be our first single-origin retail offering as well – so I’ve had this coffee a time or two. As such, it seemed like a good chance to use the RBG with a familiar coffee and an unfamiliar method. So, I used the Bonavita in the lab to brew into a large Chemex – and the 37g of coffee looked like a woefully small amount.

I was expecting the combination of a low throw weight with an odd brewing system to produce a washed-out cup, with much of the brew water passing the coffee entirely and what was left overextracting like crazy. As you can see in the photo, the Bonavita did not overfill the Chemex, though it kept the water level higher than I would have if I were brewing it by hand.

Honestly? It was tasty, and not unlike what I would have expected from a low dose using a special kettle. I shared with the incoming espresso training, and they liked it even more than I did – calling it ‘subtle’ and ‘tea-like,’ which are accurate descriptors. It had the same melon sweetness at the finish that New Harvest’s Coko always shows, as well as an awesome clarity – body, was lacking, but the combination of low dose and hearty Chemex filter probably had something to do with that. I’m going to play with this brewing combination a bit more – though with less random inputs, perhaps.

I’d give it a 7/10. It’s delicate and sweet and subtle, though a bit simple and thin.

3/20/2012 Brew

Random Brew Recipe:  63g coffee / 1 kg water, 2 minute brew time.

Brew Method: Aeropress (inverted)
Actual Recipe: 13g coffee, 200g water at 198F
Coffee: Tonx Burundi

Notes notes notes: This recipe is not far off of my usual specs for a general brew, though I admittedly usually updose a bit for my Aeropress consumption (closer to 72g / L). The 2 minute brew time was about right, and in keeping the brew as scientific as possible, I messed around with it as little as possible – which is tough! For whatever reason, I recognize now that I have really added a lot of little steps to my Aeropress routine (pour 100g, stir, wait 10 seconds, pour 120g, etc etc) – so this pared-down version was nice.

The coffee itself is great. I’m lucky to have friends who share their coffee subscriptions, and the Burundi from Tonx is no joke. Floral, hugely aromatic, a great cup in general.

This particular iteration was light in body, and quite tea-like. The flavors grew as it cooled, with a sweet bergamot toward the finish and an acidity reminiscent of hoppy IPAs up front. This is a far cry from my usual hefty-and-hearty Aeropress, and I really enjoyed it.

I’d give this brew an 8/10

3/19/2012 Brew

Random Brew Recipe:  71g coffee / 1 kg water, 5 minute brew time.

Brew Method: French Press
Actual Recipe: 36g coffee, 500g water at 198F
Coffee: New Harvest Coffee Roasters’ Ethiopia Gera Jimma

Notes notes notes: These settings provided an interesting cup for me.

Aroma-wise, there is a subtle brown sugar sweetness, which is light and pleasant. The coffee itself has that very present body you would expect from a French Press, but the flavor is thin and relatively simple. It is a quick flavor experience, with some simple acidity leading into a sweet, quick finish. It’s a fine coffee, but it’s surprisingly unsatisfying. Here’s why:

– These settings are quite close to a brew last week that was very good, albeit with a different coffee.
– The combination of a relatively high does and relatively long brew time in a French Press challenges my assumptions about coffee extraction and flavor notes.

When I consider how the spectrum of coffee extraction affects the flavor of the resulting brew, I usually associate thinness and astringent finish with overextraction, whereas a quick flavor experience, sour initial flavors, and oily body with underextraction. These general rules seem to work pretty well with espresso and drip brewing, but full-immersion brewing is more challenging for me. That is, a drip brew’s later extraction is necessarily associated with the passage of additional water – meaning that the thin body may be caused by the additional water rather than by drawing out thinning agents (thinning agents?)  from the bean itself.

With immersion brewing, I need to adjust my thinking, and consider perhaps surface area more. Time to revisit Everything But Espresso again!

I’d give this brew a 6 / 10.